Table 2 Performance obtained on each combination when parameters are locally optimized. The final row shows the average performance when the best local parameters are applied for each source combination.
From: Multiple Source Localization Based on Acoustic Map De-Emphasis
| Â | GCF | M-OGCF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â |
|
|
| Baseline |
|
|
| Baseline |
P1-P2 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 91.1% | 54.4% | 3.5 | 0.7 | 87.3% | 50.6% |
P1-P3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 92.2% | 62.7% | 1.5 | 2.5 | 80.4% | 64.7% |
P1-P4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 88.9% | 79.8% | 5.5 | 0.2 | 90.8% | 85.3% |
P1-P5 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 100% | 65.7% | 5.5 | 1.5 | 100% | 61.6% |
P2-P3 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 84.8% | 55.7% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 86.0% | 55.7% |
P2-P4 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 78.1% | 17.2% | 5.5 | 1.5 | 79.7% | 28.1% |
P2-P5 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 84.2% | 61.4% | 7.5 | 1.5 | 86.2% | 57.4% |
P3-P4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 88.9% | 52.8% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 91.7% | 55.6% |
P3-P5 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 99.0% | 75.5% | 2.5 | 1.0 | 100% | 68.6% |
P4-P5 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 79.3% | 48.3% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 82.7% | 48.3% |
Best | — | — | 87.9% | 59.9% | — | — | 88.7% | 59.7% |
